You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for sharing your excellent work and the open-source code! I have a couple of questions regarding the model parameters and training configuration:
I loaded the spikeyolo-L model version from your code and observed that the model parameters are approximately 65M. However, in your paper, the parameters for this model are reported as 68.8M, a difference of about 3M. Could this discrepancy be due to an issue in the snn_yolov8.yaml configuration file, or is there another reason for this difference?
To reproduce the results on the COCO-17 dataset, I followed the settings described in the paper. In the default.yaml configuration file, I set lr0 to 0.01 and lrf to 0.004. Are these the correct values? Additionally, should I keep other training parameters unchanged?
I appreciate your clarification and look forward to your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for not clarifying this in the code documentation. When the model size is l/x, the expansion factor of the last MS_convblock channel of the detection head becomes "2" (which is “1” in the s/m size models), which results in a parameter quantity difference of about 3M. We will clarify this issue in a future update and upload the 69M model .
Yes, you don't need to make modifications to the hyperparameters
Thank you for sharing your excellent work and the open-source code! I have a couple of questions regarding the model parameters and training configuration:
I loaded the spikeyolo-L model version from your code and observed that the model parameters are approximately 65M. However, in your paper, the parameters for this model are reported as 68.8M, a difference of about 3M. Could this discrepancy be due to an issue in the snn_yolov8.yaml configuration file, or is there another reason for this difference?
To reproduce the results on the COCO-17 dataset, I followed the settings described in the paper. In the default.yaml configuration file, I set lr0 to 0.01 and lrf to 0.004. Are these the correct values? Additionally, should I keep other training parameters unchanged?
I appreciate your clarification and look forward to your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: