-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Silkscreen for skin-board position #4
Comments
Yes, people can use the X position and still have easy access to buttons, LEDs, SD card and USB. I think it would be best (and a good idea) to add prominent markings on the silk screen to show the orientation of the skin. If we wanted to allow easy "plug and play" skins, like Arduino, then that would conflict with soldering them flat to the back side of the board. If we make the skins stackable then you can put them on the front or back. If we choose low-profile connectors, then that keeps it relatively slim. |
FWIW the stackable nature of the digispark works pretty well. It can go above and/or below - if you have the right pins/headers soldered in. A nice board made by the smartmaker people allows you to connect any I/O to any. I indicate it as an example :) I wonder if it is possible to set any policies that might allow boards to interoperate minimally. I mean cutting the least number of traces. but I admit to not seeing a path here... |
For a lot of skins, we just need power and I2C, and this bus can be used by more than one skin at one time. Thus skins would really be stackable. If the skin needs SPI or other GPIO, then it would be difficult to make 2 skins compatible. But having 2 skin positions I think goes a long way to help this problem. It means you can put a stack of I2C skins in the one position, and another more complicated skin in the other position. |
Hi,
in the present config, I really like the idea that two skin board can be added side-by-side. This allows to add a single board on the X pos, but keeps the access to buttons and LEDs open.
Since both areas are 180deg rotated I believe people might often confuse the correct position of the skin boards.
What would be saved is the relatively large space created by header pins if one decide to solder boards simply back to back together. One drawback however would be a unintended pressing of the buttons in case someone operates the board upside down (e.g. to access the skin board) on a table. However, that might depend on the final height of the USB connector, the SD card reader and other components which might keep the buttons away from the table surface.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: