Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Gather batch inversions instead of parallelising them #2818

Open
dannywillems opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Gather batch inversions instead of parallelising them #2818

dannywillems opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dannywillems
Copy link
Member 

          Is this as efficient (or better) than having all of the scratch inverses in a single list and doing a single batch inversion of it all, instead of `n` parallel of shorter ones? Wondering for performance.

Originally posted by @querolita in #2813 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dannywillems