Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PAGE ISSUE] Lazy minting #242

Open
NFTsWTF opened this issue May 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[PAGE ISSUE] Lazy minting #242

NFTsWTF opened this issue May 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization

Comments

@NFTsWTF
Copy link

NFTsWTF commented May 5, 2022

Hi guys!
First of all Thank you for the great tutorial.
I am doing my PhD on NFTs and Intellecual Property/Contract Law.

When Redeeming a voucher on-chain.
In the example code the NFT is first assigned to the signee (creator of the NFT Collection)
/ first assign the token to the signer, to establish provenance on-chain
and then directly transfered to the redeemer.
// transfer the token to the redeemer

My question is:
You don't have to do that, do you?
For example the BYAC did not do that. I was looking at the transfer history on OpenSea and the Apes all have been minted to different adresses.
If they would have followed the procedure described above, the would have all be minted to the same adress (BYAC owner) and then transfered to different accounts. Did I get that right?

Thank you very much in advance for helping a stupid lawyer :-D

@NFTsWTF NFTsWTF added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label May 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant