Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The link of **Multi-view Stereo Correspondence** doesn't exist in the doc #8722

Open
hyperkai opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@hyperkai
Copy link

📚 The doc issue

The link of Multi-view Stereo Correspondence doesn't exist in the doc as shown below:

Screenshot 2024-11-10 102207

Suggest a potential alternative/fix

No response

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Nov 11, 2024

Moving to http://github.com/pytorch/vision as one can clearly see from the URL it's not a PyTorch issue

@malfet malfet transferred this issue from pytorch/pytorch Nov 11, 2024
@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the report @hyperkai . Do you mind submitting a PR to update the link to https://phototour.cs.washington.edu/patches/default.htm ?

@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

Oh, actually I'm not sure my suggestion above is the right thing to do. The docs say:

     .. note::

        We only provide the newer version of the dataset, since the authors state that it

            is more suitable for training descriptors based on difference of Gaussian, or Harris corners, as the
            patches are centred on real interest point detections, rather than being projections of 3D points as is the
            case in the old dataset.

        The original dataset is available under http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/patches/default.htm.

and the download links are e.g. http://matthewalunbrown.com/patchdata/notredame_harris.zip (but they all lead to a 404). It looks like a proper fix would be to update those URLs with the same "new" dataset, but I'm not aware of a working one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants