Deep Learning for Visual Tracking: A Comprehensive Survey (Extended version of the paper on arXiv)
The comprehensive comparisons of recent Deep Learning (DL)-based visual tracking methods on the OTB-2013, OTB-2015, VOT-2018, and LaSOT datasets (Raw Results on OTB Dataset, Raw Results on VOT Dataset, Raw Results on LaSOT Dataset).
===============================================================================
Licence: copyright 2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
===============================================================================
Performance Comparison of Visual Trackers in terms of Precision and Success Plots on OTB-2013 Dataset (Ranking based on Area Under Curve (AUC)) [OTB-2013 Dataset] [OTB-2013 Paper]:
- Average Performance Comparisons of Visual Tracking Methods: - Attribute-based Performance Comparisons (Eleven attributes including: Illumination Variation (IV), Scale Variation (SV), Occlusion (OCC), Deformation (DEF), Motion Blur (MB), Fast Motion (FM), In-Plane Rotation (IPR), Out-of-Plane Rotation (OPR), Out-of-View (OV), Background Clutter (BC), Low Resolution (LR)):
Performance Comparison of Visual Trackers in terms of Precision and Success Plots on OTB-2015 Dataset (Ranking based on Area Under Curve (AUC)) [OTB-2015 Dataset][OTB-2015 Paper]:
- Average Performance Comparisons of Visual Tracking Methods: - Attribute-based Performance Comparisons (Eleven attributes including: Illumination Variation (IV), Scale Variation (SV), Occlusion (OCC), Deformation (DEF), Motion Blur (MB), Fast Motion (FM), In-Plane Rotation (IPR), Out-of-Plane Rotation (OPR), Out-of-View (OV), Background Clutter (BC), Low Resolution (LR)):
Performance Comparison of Visual Trackers on VOT-2018 Dataset [VOT-2018 Dataset][VOT-2018 Paper]:
- Overview: Expected Overlap Analysis:
Experiment Baseline (Attribute-based Ranking: Camera Motion, Illumination Change, Motion Change, Occlusion, Size Change, No Degradation):
- Orderings for overall overlap:
- AR plot for illumination change:
Experiment Baseline (Speed Report) [first to third methods are shown by yellow, blue, and green colors.]:
- Normalized (Equivalent Filter Operations (EFO): "tracker speed in terms of a predefined filtering operation that the VOT tookit automatically carries out prior to running the experiments"):
- Orderings for overall overlap:
- Overlap plot for camera motion:
- Overlap plot for illum change:
- Overlap plot for motion change:
- Overlap plot for size change:
- Overlap plot for no degradation:
Experiment Unsupervised (Speed Report): [first to third methods are shown by yellow, blue, and green colors.]:
- Normalized (Equivalent Filter Operations (EFO): "tracker speed in terms of a predefined filtering operation that the VOT tookit automatically carries out prior to running the experiments"):
Qualitative Comparisons of State-of-the-art Visual Tracking Methods on VOT2018 Dataset (Under TraX Protocol):
BMX_Video, Crabs1_Video, Gymnastics3_Video, Motorcross2_Video, Singer3_Video, Godfather_Video, Bag_Video, Dinasaur_Video, Matrix_Video, Hand_Video, Glove_Video, Ball2_Video, Blanket_Video, Gymnastics1_Video, Butterfly_Video, Motorcross1_Video, Pedestrian_Video, Singer2_Video, Shaking_Video, Racing_Video, Handball1_Video, Sheep_Video, Bolt1_Video, Fernando_Video, Bolt2_Video, Book_Video, Leaves_Video, Fish1_Video, Fish2_Video, Tiger_Video, Wiper_Video, Traffic_Video, Crossing_Video, Fish3_Video, Ball1_Video, Graduate_Video, Iceskater_Video, Soldier_Video, DroneAcross_Video, Soccer2_Video, DroneFlip_Video, Ants1_Video, Iceskater_Video, Handball2_Video, Nature_Video, Ants3_Video, Road_Video, Helicopter_Video, Girl_Video, Gymnastics2_Video, Conduction_Video, Zebrafish1_Video, Basketball_Video, Frisbee_Video, Car1_Video, Birds1_Video, Drone1_Video, Flamingo_Video.
Performance Comparison of Visual Trackers in terms of Precision and Success Plots on LaSOT Dataset (Ranking based on Area Under Curve (AUC)) [LaSOT Dataset][LaSOT Paper]:
- Average Performance Comparisons of Visual Tracking Methods: - Attribute-based Performance Comparisons (Fourteen attributes including: Illumination Variation (IV), Scale Variation (SV), Deformation (DEF), Motion Blur (MB), Fast Motion (FM), Out-of-View (OV), Background Clutter (BC), Low Resolution (LR), Aspect Ratio Change (ARC), Camera Motion (CM), Full Occlusion (FOC), Partial Occlusion (POC), Viewpoint Change (VC), Rotation (ROT)):