-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
ec9d377
commit 338a5c1
Showing
7 changed files
with
107 additions
and
6 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ | ||
--- | ||
sidebar_position: 11 | ||
description: "Learn how the daily.dev algorithm works, including content filtering, recommendation system strategies, and how it adapts to user engagement and post freshness." | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# How the Algorithm works | ||
|
||
## Summary | ||
The daily.dev feed algorithm is designed to deliver the most relevant content to each user. This system is built to optimize relevance and engagement using recommendation techniques, including content-based filtering, collaborative filtering, and advanced methods for enhancing personalization. | ||
|
||
## Objective | ||
The primary goal of the algorithm is to provide users with content that matches their interests while continuously adapting based on user interactions and engagement patterns. The system balances relevance with diversity, ensuring that users are exposed to both familiar and new topics. | ||
|
||
## Recommendation System Overview | ||
The daily.dev recommendation system is built around an infinite scroll feed that surfaces content based on both traditional and modern recommendation strategies. The focus is on content-based and collaborative filtering, with deep learning methods noted for potential future enhancements. | ||
|
||
### 1. Content-Based Filtering | ||
- **Mechanism:** Recommends content similar to what the user has interacted with previously, such as articles they have read or upvoted. | ||
- **Pros:** | ||
- No need for data from other users, making it effective for niche or specialized content. | ||
- Provides recommendations that align with the user's existing preferences. | ||
- **Cons:** | ||
- Relies on predefined features, which limits adaptability to new trends. | ||
- Less effective at broadening the user’s horizons or introducing diverse content. | ||
|
||
### 2. Collaborative Filtering | ||
- **Mechanism:** Recommends content based on the preferences of users with similar interaction patterns, enabling discovery of new topics. | ||
- **Pros:** | ||
- Helps users explore content beyond their known interests, promoting discovery. | ||
- Can function even with minimal user-specific contextual data. | ||
- **Cons:** | ||
- Struggles with the cold start problem, where there is insufficient data to recommend new content. | ||
- Faces challenges in incorporating additional features like content freshness or publication sources. | ||
|
||
## Addressing the Cold Start Problem | ||
A critical challenge for recommendation systems is the **cold start problem**, where it becomes difficult to recommend content for new users or new posts due to a lack of interaction data. | ||
|
||
- **User Cold Start:** For new users, the system quickly gathers initial interests based on interactions (e.g., article views, upvotes) to deliver increasingly relevant content. | ||
- **Post Cold Start:** For new posts, initial exposure is limited to gather engagement metrics (e.g., clicks, upvotes). Over time, metadata and user engagement help the system assess the post’s value. | ||
|
||
## User Lifecycle Phases | ||
The algorithm evolves with the user’s lifecycle, refining content recommendations as more data is gathered over time. | ||
|
||
1. **New User:** The system starts with general recommendations based on broad interests. | ||
2. **Onboarding:** Initial user metadata, such as interests and experience, is collected to refine future recommendations. | ||
3. **Learning Phase:** Early user interactions, such as upvotes and downvotes, help personalize the feed. | ||
4. **Personalization:** The algorithm continuously adapts as more user-specific data is gathered, delivering a highly tailored feed experience. | ||
|
||
## Post Lifecycle Phases | ||
Posts also go through different stages within the recommendation system: | ||
|
||
1. **Fresh Post:** New posts are given limited exposure to gather initial feedback. | ||
2. **Engagement Assessment:** Posts are evaluated based on predefined metrics (e.g., upvotes, time spent reading). | ||
3. **Engaged Post:** Posts that meet engagement thresholds remain in the feed longer, but are periodically reassessed. | ||
4. **Drop Post:** Posts that fail to meet engagement criteria are gradually removed from the feed. | ||
|
||
## Inventory Strategy | ||
To maintain relevance and diversity in the feed, daily.dev continuously expands its content sources beyond just web-based materials. This approach ensures users receive a wide array of content, including both familiar and fresh perspectives. | ||
|
||
The overall strategy of the daily.dev algorithm is to create a feed that is not only personalized but also dynamic, continuously evolving based on user behavior and the freshness of the content. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -23,3 +23,4 @@ | |
align-items: center; | ||
justify-content: center; | ||
} | ||
|