-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[E-Document Connector] Logiq E-Document Connector #27562
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Companial" |
New pull request instead of #27101 |
Thanks for fixing the issue.
Feel free to look at Avalara as the example. In the mean time we will start looking at the code. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some initial comments.
Overall the code is good quality and i will continue review.
Please see comment about moving to seperate app :)
|
||
enum 6380 "Logiq API Engine" | ||
{ | ||
Extensible = false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mark it as internal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Marked as Internal
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | |||
namespace Microsoft.EServices.EDocumentConnector.Logiq; | |||
|
|||
enum 6380 "Logiq API Engine" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dont prefix with Logiq
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed prefix
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ | |||
namespace Microsoft.EServices.EDocumentConnector.Logiq; | |||
|
|||
codeunit 6380 "Logiq Auth" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please move the code to EDocumentConnectors
Create app for the connector.
Create app for the test automation.
Feel free to look at Avalara as the example.
In the mean time we will start looking at the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created connector and test apps. Moved to EDocumentConnectors folder
ResponseMessage: HttpResponseMessage; | ||
AccessToken, RefreshToken : SecretText; | ||
AccessTokExpires, RefreshTokExpires : DateTime; | ||
AuthenticationFailedErr: Label 'Logiq authentication failed. Please check the user credentials.'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Labels needs to be on global var.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Labels moved to global var
|
||
internal procedure CheckUserCredentials(var LogiqConnectionUserSetup: Record "Logiq Connection User Setup") | ||
var | ||
NoSetupErr: Label 'No user setup found. Please fill the user setup in the Logiq Connection User Setup page.'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Labels to global var
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Labels moved to global var
|
||
page 6380 "Logiq Connection Setup" | ||
{ | ||
Caption = 'E-Document External Connection Setup'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Different name. Use connector name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed
DataClassification = CustomerContent; | ||
fields | ||
{ | ||
field(1; PK; Code[10]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
20 is standard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed Code 10 > 20
Added tests Added app.json files Fixes
@tstefanovicius new interfaces will break the build :) |
Ahh, it was committed two days ago, will update |
Set Setup tables to Internal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will continue to look later. Good changes so far!
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | |||
namespace Microsoft.EServices.EDocumentConnector.Logiq; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All files should contain the license comments as the first thing.
{ | ||
addafter(GetApproval) | ||
{ | ||
action(UpdateStatus) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great that we have an action. 👍 🥇
Set visibility based on if document relates to Service, and is incomming/Outgoing?
Can you change this to use the IDocumentAction interface. Then you dont have to do the manual logging you are doing. You should not do that essentially. Framework shoud.
I can see that this also checks approval. What is stauses is it checking. Do we have a more specific name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is for sent documents. Can we use Approval action that already exissts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sent documents in Logiq system can have statuses: "received" and "processed" (which we translate to "In Progress Logiq" service status), "distributed" (translate to approved to work with the framework even thought it's not exactly the same status) and "failed" (translate to "Failed Logiq"). We could use standard approval action but if I understand correctly, the standard status logging would not recognize custom service statuses as processed or error, so the document status would always be in progress.
Added logo Updated app.jsons Added Logiq External Id field
E-Documents connector interface implementation between Business Central and Logiq
Work Item(s)
Fixes #27058
Fixes AB#541809