-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unnecessary (and incorrect) Zygote rule for PDBijector #286
Conversation
Long-term ideally we would not define Zygote-specific rules anymore but mainly/only ChainRules definitions. To this PR: Doesn't this require FluxML/Zygote.jl#1444? If so, I guess we should add/update the lower bound for Zygote. |
Fixed. |
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ ReverseDiff = "37e2e3b7-166d-5795-8a7a-e32c996b4267" | |||
Tracker = "9f7883ad-71c0-57eb-9f7f-b5c9e6d3789c" | |||
Zygote = "e88e6eb3-aa80-5325-afca-941959d7151f" | |||
|
|||
[extras] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is only Zygote added here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't matter for our tests because we have test/Project.toml. But Pkg requires it, otherwise it's not possible to add a compat entry for a weak dependency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should just remove the test/Project.toml if possible (IIRC it helped with some dependency incompatibilities a while ago but maybe that's not a problem anymore).
Addresses TuringLang/Turing.jl#2018 (comment)